INSIDE
AMERICA
Christianity and Gnosticism: A Conflict
About Method
The Method Is the Incarnation, Through which the Divine Becomes our Companion
as a Concrete Human Presence
In the last verse of the Gnostic text the Gospel of Thomas, Peter asks
Jesus to send Mary Magdalene away because “women are not worthy of life.” Jesus
replies, “I myself shall lead her in order to make her male, so that
she too might become a living spirit resembling you males. For every woman who
makes herself male will enter the kingdom of heaven.” This Gnostic text
is not mentioned in The DaVinci Code by Dan Brown, the pro-feminist novel that
has been among the top best-selling books in the country for months and months
now. Mr Brown has to be selective in the Gnostic literature upon which he basis
his fictional story about a plot by the Catholic Church to suppress evidence
of a form of early Christianity in which women were more important than the apostles.
The problem is that this does not correspond exactly to many Gnostic views about
women. It is true that Gnostic doctrine is not easy to summarize neatly because
it is an amalgam of pagan, Jewish, Christian, and ancient Oriental religious
and spiritual currents. Still, it was not an exalted view of women that characterized
Gnosticism; it was androgyny. Gnostics despised the material universe, seeing
it not as the creation of the transcendent God, but of a lower demigod (identified
with the God of the Old Testament) that obscured our view of the true God and
imprisoned us in the flesh. The Gnostics were those who “knew” this
truth and were thus able to be saved from the evil material world. They were
the pneumatics or spiritualists. The human body (and therefore gender), therefore,
was an obstacle to salvation. According to this view, men were the truly spiritual
humans, and women, if not totally identified with the material, represented the “spiritual
principle within the material,” set free precisely by becoming “like
men,” that is, spiritually androgynous. Feminist interest in Gnosticism
is not something new. It is present at the beginning of the 19th century, when
the text of the document Pistis Sophia (published in English in 1846) showed
Mary Magdalene as the prime apostle of Jesus. However, it is not concrete Gnostic
doctrines that attract modern feminists. It is the method of approaching Christianity
that allows views such as these. This method is perfectly summarized by the main
character in Brown's novel, Harvard “symbologist” Robert Langdon: “Every
faith is based on fabrication. That is the definition of faith–acceptance
of what we imagine to be true, that which we cannot prove. Every religion describes
God through metaphor, allegory, and exaggeration, from the early Egyptians through
modern Sunday school. Metaphors are a way to help our mind process the unprocessable.
The problem arises when we begin to believe literally in our metaphors. Those
who truly understand their faiths understand the stories are metaphorical.” (Indeed,
it is not the texts that compel Langdon to believe in their teachings; it is
a “mystical experience” at Mary Magdalene’s tomb in which she
explains it all to him. So much for the novel’s academic pretensions of
historical analysis.) The ultimate conflict between the Church and Gnosticism,
both at the beginning of Christianity and now, is not thus a conflict about feminism,
or about historical criticism, or about textual interpretations. These are secondary.
It is a conflict about method. Put succinctly, Gnosticism–both ancient
and contemporary–is unable to escape the poverty of our wounded religious
sense, and thus reduces the Christian proposal to a purely religious experience.
But religious experience is not the “method” through which we reach
our true destiny. The Christian proposal is not a message to be learned or a
metaphor to be deciphered. It is an event to be verified, an encounter with a
human presence. The method is the Incarnation, through which the divine becomes
our companion as a concrete human presence in human flesh. Salvation springs
from the earth, from human flesh, from human matter, from the very body despised
by the Gnostics. Thus the Church prays: You wonderfully manifested Your great
glory, not only by rescuing us from our mortality with the power of Your divinity,
but by foreseeing the remedy in the very same mortality, making that which had
brought about our ruin the beginning of our salvation, through Christ our Lord.
(Sunday Preface V, author's translation.)